#announcement#methodology#start
AIGrit — Review Principles and First Post
How AIGrit tests and reviews AI tools, and the criteria we use to recommend or pass.
Reading time 1min
TL;DR
AIGrit is a hands-on AI tool review blog. We use each tool for at least 3 days, then compare speed, cost, and accuracy with numbers. We write — we don't sell.
Review principles
- Validation — hands-on results, not ad copy. Minimum 3 days of use before any review.
- Numbers — speed, cost, accuracy expressed in numbers. Test setup and sample size disclosed.
- Comparison — 1:1 or N:N comparisons preferred over solo reviews. Alternatives are always included.
- Context — we specify "as an office worker" / "as a developer" scenarios so readers can map their own situation.
See the Korean original for full methodology and rationale.
Related Posts
Claude 4 Sonnet vs GPT-4o: Korean, Coding, and Reasoning Benchmarks
Claude 4 Sonnet and GPT-4o compared on Korean language quality, coding, reasoning, and creative writing — with per-token cost, latency, and context window data.
Claude Code vs Cursor: Real-World AI Coding Tool Showdown
We tested Claude Code and Cursor on real Flutter apps and a Next.js monorepo. Speed, accuracy, cost, and workflow compared with data.